Will Supreme Court Reaffirm Fair Process for Immigrants?

When the U.S. Supreme Court reconvenes next week, their docket will include two important immigration cases. Both cases present the Supreme Court with opportunities to reaffirm that immigrants must be afforded fair process and a meaningful opportunity to be heard. The first case, Padilla v. Kentucky, set for October 13, will examine whether a criminal defense attorney has the obligation to provide foreign-born defendants with advice about what impact their criminal case will have on their immigration case. It will also decide whether defendants have a remedy when defense attorneys provide incorrect advice. The second case, Kucana v. Holder, set for November 10, deals with immigrants' access to federal court review of government immigration decisions such as motions to reopen by the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Related Posts

Fifth Circuit Holds Immigrants Can Pursue Cases From Outside the USA

Fifth Circuit Holds Immigrants Can Pursue Cases From Outside the USA

Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit rejected the government’s ongoing attempt to bar noncitizens from seeking reopening and reconsideration of their cases fr...

SCOTUS Decides Final Two Immigration Cases For Its Term

SCOTUS Decides Final Two Immigration Cases For Its Term

On Monday,the U.S. Supreme Court decided the final two immigration cases for its term – Mata v. Lynch (mata case attached) and Kerry v. Din. (kerry case attached).

U.S. Supreme Court Decides Final Two Immigration Cases For Its Term

U.S. Supreme Court Decides Final Two Immigration Cases For Its Term

On June 15, 2015 the U.S. Supreme Court decided the final two immigration cases for its term – Mata v. Lynch and Kerry v. Din.